Adversarial validation
Attack my idea
Describe what you want to build. We search 1,953 real complaints and payment signals for the reasons it fails — then tell you whether to build, validate, narrow it, or stop.
What you get back
- A verdict, not a score
- Build candidate, validate first, narrow the wedge, or kill it. A number out of 100 tells you nothing; these tell you what to do on Monday.
- The strongest counter-evidence first
- Not the supporting case. Anyone can find reasons to build — you already have them, that is why you are here.
- Every claim tied to a record
- Reference ids are checked against the database before you see them. A claim we cannot source is dropped rather than softened.
- What we could not check
- The gaps in our own evidence, shown even when the verdict is positive. Confidence you cannot audit is not confidence.
Built from 24,591 collected records across five platforms. How the verdict is decided.